Every day, one story that matters, broken down into three numbered scenarios, each with its own probability. Never fixed — it shifts as the situation changes.
Scénario
Friday, science
Moon: Washington and Beijing Relaunch the Race
Published on September 4, 2026
Share:
The question
After five delays since 2019, NASA is aiming for 2028 and China for 2030 to bring humans back to the Moon: will this time be the one?
The facts
On September 3, 2026, a week before the International Space Summit held in Paris (September 9-10, Grand Palais) under the joint presidency of France and Germany, with around 120 countries invited, SpaceX, Blue Origin and the American start-ups Stoke Space and Starcloud announced their withdrawal — under pressure from the White House, according to Politico. An Office of Science and Technology Policy official reportedly told the companies their presence could be seen as tacit support for European Union positions, while also faulting Paris for not coordinating with Washington beforehand. French minister Philippe Baptiste responded that "the United States is welcome — and expected": NASA, NOAA and the U.S. administration remain invited. The ministry nonetheless acknowledged that these withdrawals, hard to separate from the political pressure reported in the press, complicate a cooperation it says it wants to maintain. An episode that, a week apart, sums up rather well the climate surrounding the new race to the Moon: Washington and Beijing are advancing their pieces, each at its own pace, while Europe still struggles to establish itself as a serious third player.
On April 11, 2026, four astronauts had already completed the first crewed flyby of the Moon since 1972, with Artemis II — proof that NASA can still send humans there, just not land them yet. At the same time, China is testing, piece by piece, the rocket, capsule and lander meant to put its own astronauts on the Moon by 2030. After decades of pause since Apollo, both countries insist they really mean to go back this time — and stay. The question several analysts have been asking since this summer is simple: will this new race actually keep its promises, or end up like so many space deadlines before it — without leaving Europe any real place in it?
On the American side, the program is changing shape. Jared Isaacman, a business executive and former private astronaut, took over as NASA Administrator in December 2025. On March 24, 2026, he unveiled a $20 billion, seven-year plan to build a permanent base near the lunar south pole, in three phases: first robots and rovers, then temporary shelters, and finally durable habitats, linked to a small relay station in lunar orbit, the Gateway*. But Artemis III, once meant to land the first astronauts since 1972, no longer will: it has been reduced to a simple docking test in Earth orbit, set for mid-2027. The actual landing has slipped to the next mission — Artemis IV, now targeted for 2028.
Comprendre
Pushing the landing from Artemis III to Artemis IV isn't just a rename — it's the real timeline slipping.
Officially, Artemis III still keeps its mid-2027 date. But that mission no longer lands anyone on the Moon: it only tests the spacecraft in Earth orbit. The actual landing has slipped to the next mission, Artemis IV, due in 2028. Renaming the step that's causing trouble doesn't make it go away — it just gets pushed one mission further down the line.
This new timeline assumes the rockets cooperate, which is far from guaranteed. SpaceX has to turn its Starship vehicle into the HLS*, the lander meant to put astronauts on the Moon — but it has never yet been refueled in orbit*, a step that's mandatory before it can carry a crew. To hedge against that risk, NASA opened the competition to Blue Origin, Jeff Bezos's company, in October 2025. But Blue Origin has had its own setback: its New Glenn rocket exploded on the ground on May 28, 2026, during a test at Cape Canaveral, due to a faulty valve on one of its engines. The company promises a return to flight before the end of the year.
China is advancing its own roadmap, piece by piece. Its Long March 10 rocket, Mengzhou capsule, Lanyue lander and Wangyu spacesuit all successfully passed a low-altitude abort test in February 2026. An uncrewed test flight, named Mengzhou-1, is set to dock the capsule with China's Tiangong space station before the end of the year. Beijing still aims for a first crewed landing before 2030, a target it has repeated unchanged since the program launched in the mid-2010s, before building, together with Russia, a permanent robotic base — the International Lunar Research Station* (ILRS) — by 2035.
Both countries are eyeing the same region: the lunar south pole, where certain craters, never lit by the Sun, are believed to hold water ice built up over billions of years. A resource seen as decisive in turning a simple planted flag into a lasting presence.
Comprendre
At the lunar south pole, what both countries really want isn't the ground itself — it's the water ice hidden in its craters.
That ice could become drinking water, breathable oxygen, or rocket fuel. The 1967 Outer Space Treaty bars any country from claiming the Moon as its own. But it does allow safety zones* around an installation, without ever specifying their size — an exclusion zone in all but name. That's why Washington and Beijing are both eyeing the same small region.
China's Chang'e-7 probe, tasked with confirming and mapping that ice, was due to launch on August 24, 2026 — it was pushed back to 2027 after Typhoon Narra hit the Wenchang launch site. The same setback hit the American side: the small Griffin lander, built by the company Astrobotic for NASA, is due to attempt reaching the same region by the end of 2026, with no guarantee of success. Several milestones over the coming months will already offer a first clue as to which of the three scenarios is taking the lead:
The next milestones that will decide it
1Late 2026 — Mengzhou-1China's first uncrewed test flight of its capsule, with docking planned at the Tiangong station.
2Late 2026 — New Glenn's return to flightBlue Origin promises a new launch of its rocket, after the May 28 explosion on the pad.
3Late 2026 — Griffin's landing attemptThe small lander built by Astrobotic for NASA is set to try to reach the south pole.
42027 (date not yet set) — New Chang'e-7 launchToward the lunar south pole, after the delay caused by Typhoon Narra.
5Mid-2027 — Artemis IIIDocking test in Earth orbit between Orion and the lunar landers, with no landing.
62028 — Artemis IVThe first American crewed Moon landing targeted since 1972, if the timeline finally holds.
China's timeline for a first crewed landing, meanwhile, stays fixed at 2030 — with no intermediate step officially dated before then.
Since 2019, every new administration or NASA official has promised a date for returning to the Moon, and every promised date has ended up slipping — a pattern the chart below confirms. That's why this topic lends itself to three distinct scenarios: either both timelines finally hold this time, or the tests keep advancing without any actual landing for a long while yet, or a technical or budget setback stops one of the two programs cold.
American crewed Moon landing targeted2028 (Artemis IV) ▲ pushed back 4 years vs. 2024, the original 2019 promise
Chinese crewed Moon landing targeted2030 → unchanged since the program launched (mid-2010s)
American crewed Moon landing target, every promise since 2019
Since 2019, every new announcement has pushed back the return-to-Moon date — never moved it up.
Each point reflects the target year officially announced at that time, held until the next revision — no continuous path between two announcements. Sources: SpacePolicyOnline, U.S. Government Accountability Office and NASA Office of Inspector General reports — see Sources at the bottom of the edition.
Favorable, stable or degraded
A real return to the Moon, or another broken promise?
What we're assessing
FavorableBoth timelines, American and Chinese, finally hold their dates without a new delay.
StableThe technical tests keep advancing, but the date of the first landing slips once again.
DegradedA serious technical failure or a budget cut stops one of the two programs.
Favorable
20%
Unlikely
Both timelines finally hold their dates
New Glenn's return to flight succeeds before the end of the year, and Starship completes its first in-orbit refueling in spring 2027. Artemis III goes off without a hitch on schedule, and Artemis IV lands two American astronauts on the Moon in 2028, as announced. On the Chinese side, Mengzhou-1 docks without incident at Tiangong by late 2026, Chang'e-7 launches successfully in early 2027, and the program stays on track for 2030. Both countries, in parallel, start funding the first concrete building blocks of their respective bases.
This is the least likely of the three scenarios: it assumes neither program suffers even a single further setback, even though each has already slipped multiple times since 2019 on the American side, and just took its first hit in 2026 on the Chinese side. Less likely than the stable scenario, where the tests keep advancing without the final date necessarily holding; and far less likely than the degraded scenario, for which the fragilities already visible — Starship, New Glenn — are enough on their own.
Indicators affected
American crewed Moon landing targeted2028 confirmed→(vs. 2028, announced in 2026)
Chinese crewed Moon landing targeted2030 held→(vs. 2030, targeted since the program launched)
The France angle
The program's steady pace benefits ESA's next public tender for the rest of the Gateway, where Thales Alenia Space (Cannes) is already building the Esprit module and the robotic Argonaut lander, for more than €1.3 billion in contracts already secured. ↑ Favorable for France.
Stable
50%
Likely
The tests keep advancing, the timeline slips once more
The technical tests keep advancing on both sides — new test flights, new hardware milestones — with no major failure that stops an entire program. But the date of the first crewed landing slips once again, as it has five times before since 2019: Artemis IV shifts to 2029 or 2030. China, for its part, either just barely holds its stated target, or itself announces a delay of a year or two. Neither country lands astronauts on the Moon before the end of the decade, but neither program stops either.
This is the most likely of the three scenarios: it's exactly the pattern that has repeated itself five times since 2019, and nothing in the current financial or political means suggests a complete stop is coming. More likely than the favorable scenario, which assumes no further setback occurs even though both programs have already had one this year; more likely too than the degraded scenario, which requires a shock more serious than just one more delay.
Indicators affected
American crewed Moon landing targeted~2029-2030↓(vs. 2028, announced in 2026)
Chinese crewed Moon landing targeted~2030-2031↓(vs. 2030, targeted since the program launched)
The France angle
The contracts already signed by Thales Alenia Space for the Gateway's Esprit module (€296.5 million) and the Argonaut lander (€862 million) keep being carried out from Cannes regardless of Artemis's exact pace — Gateway construction isn't tied to the precise date of the first crewed landing. ↑ Somewhat favorable for France.
Degraded
30%
Likely
An accident or a budget cut stops a program
A serious new technical failure hits one of the two camps — another explosion on an American launch pad, or an incident on a Chinese test flight — pushing its timeline back by several years. Or, more bluntly, a political shift cuts the funding: a future U.S. administration could scale back a program judged too costly, just as Washington already did in 2010 by cancelling the previous Moon program, Constellation. The first crewed Moon landing, American or Chinese, gets pushed past 2032, or even suspended with no new date.
This scenario remains less likely than the stable one, which only requires one more delay — an already-established pattern, not a real stop. But it is markedly more likely than the favorable scenario: two serious setbacks, the New Glenn explosion and the Chang'e-7 delay caused by a typhoon, have already happened this year alone, and one of the two camps will, sooner or later, have to lock in multi-year budgets in a political climate that can change before the deadline.
Indicators affected
American crewed Moon landing targetedPast 2032, or suspended↓(vs. 2028, announced in 2026)
Chinese crewed Moon landing targetedPast 2032, or suspended↓(vs. 2030, targeted since the program launched)
The France angle
A budget cut or the abandonment of one of the two Moon programs would also threaten funding for the Gateway, to which France's space industry is tied — Thales Alenia Space foremost, with more than €1.3 billion in contracts already committed in Cannes for the Esprit module and the Argonaut lander. ↓ Somewhat unfavorable for France.
Rough estimates for the 3 scenarios above, based on the information available at publication and reassessed as the situation changes — never guaranteed forecasts. Learn more about our method →
The essentials
After five delays since 2019, the United States and China are relaunching their race to put humans on the Moon — this time for good.
On March 24, 2026, NASA unveiled a $20 billion, seven-year plan to build a permanent lunar base, but its own crewed landing timeline — now targeted for 2028 with Artemis IV — has already slipped five times since 2019.
The most likely scenario (50%): technical tests keep progressing on both sides, but the date of the first landing slips once again, toward 2029 or 2030, without either program actually stopping.
Signal to watch: the uncrewed Mengzhou-1 test flight, due in late 2026, and Blue Origin's New Glenn rocket returning to flight after its May 28 explosion.
Slightly positive
Our assessment of the impact on France: slightly positive. With a 70% chance that the favorable and stable scenarios (20% and 50%) keep the flow of space contracts already secured by Thales Alenia Space in Cannes, against a 30% risk that a budget cut or the abandonment of a program puts them in question.
A small space station that NASA and its international partners, including Europe, plan to assemble in lunar orbit, to serve as a relay before each descent to the surface.
HLS (Human Landing System)
NASA's name for the vehicle tasked with taking astronauts down from lunar orbit to the surface, then back up again — a role assigned to a version of Starship (SpaceX), soon opened up to Blue Moon (Blue Origin).
ILRS (International Lunar Research Station)
The robotic Moon base project jointly run by China and Russia, whose first phase is announced for 2035 at the south pole, ahead of an expansion planned for 2045.
Orbital refueling
Transferring fuel from one spacecraft to another while both are already orbiting Earth — a maneuver never carried out at this scale before, but required by Starship's flight plan to the Moon.
Safety zone (space)
A perimeter a country can set up around its lunar installation to protect its activities, allowed under international law without its size ever being precisely defined — risking, in practice, functioning as an exclusion zone.