Scénario
Edition of September 12, 2026 · No. 51
FR
Salle de cinéma vide, écran allumé face à des rangées de sièges rouges.
Scénario

Saturday, culture

Hollywood: Is the Sequel Model Hitting Its Limit?

Publié le 12 septembre 2026

The question at hand

In 2026, several big-budget sequels flopped in theaters while original films broke out. Is the franchise bet still as safe as before?

A single film, Spider-Man: Brand New Day — the sequel to the Spider-Man/Avengers showdown we already covered (read our article) — grossed $2.2 billion worldwide in 2026 and already holds the record for the biggest launch in history ($360 million in a single weekend in the US). At the same time, three other mega-budget sequels — Star Wars: The Mandalorian and Grogu, Masters of the Universe, and Supergirl — failed at the box office, each costing over $150 million without breaking even. Even Avatar: Fire and Ash, from the most profitable franchise* in cinema history, only grossed about $1.45 billion worldwide — a third less than the previous film in the saga, released three years earlier. The system of sequels, spin-offs*, and reboots* that has driven Hollywood for twenty years is showing its first visible cracks this year.

Since 2010, sequels, remakes, and prequels have occupied eight to ten spots on the annual list of the biggest US box office hits — nine out of ten still in 2024. In 2026, that number dropped to five out of ten: two completely original, ultra-low-budget films, Obsession (less than $1 million invested) and Backrooms, each surpassed $300 million in global revenue, driven by word of mouth rather than a big studio marketing campaign. A musical biopic, Michael, and a sci-fi novel adaptation, Project Hail Mary, round out this unusual podium of films without sequels or expanded universes.

Understanding it

A franchise film remains, on average, far more profitable than an original film — which explains why studios keep producing so many despite the most visible failures.

A successful franchise film averages a return of 3.1 times its investment (return on investment*, or ROI), compared to 1.8 times for a successful original film. But this average hides an uneven reality. Most original films never recoup their budget. A known franchise, however, attracts a base audience even when the film disappoints. Studios therefore bet on franchises as a less risky gamble on average, not as an individual guarantee of success.

The three largest US studios are not reacting the same way to these signals. Universal continues to roll out sequels and horror films, its annual CinemaCon* presentation to exhibitors still entirely focused on these types of films. Disney has locked in eleven sequels and live-action remakes through 2029, including Avengers: Secret Wars and Frozen 3, without slowing down despite this year's failures. Warner Bros., weakened a year earlier by its $110B mega-merger with Discovery (detailed in our article, read more), conversely touts an

Here's how each of the three biggest US players is reacting to the same warning signs, studio by studio:

Three studios, three strategies in the face of the same failures
  • 1 Disney — all-in on franchises Eleven sequels and remakes locked in through 2029 (including Avengers: Secret Wars, Frozen 3) · no change of course announced after the 2026 failures.
  • 2 Universal — steady course on sequels and horror 2026 CinemaCon presentation entirely focused on franchises and horror films, with no visible shift.
  • 3 Warner Bros. — eclectic catalog by design Theatrical releases rising (11 in 2025, up to 18 planned for 2027) · mixes franchises and original works, rewarded at the 2026 Oscars.

Two out of three studios have, at this stage, changed no strategy despite the 2026 failures — Warner Bros.' bet remains, for now, an exception rather than a new industry norm.

The problem is not that Universal and Disney are ignoring the warning signs: it's that they are betting on their ability to absorb individual failures through volume and a few very big successes, rather than changing their approach.

Understanding it

'Franchise fatigue' might not mean what we think: the problem looks as much like a release logjam as a rejection of the very principle of sequels.

Masters of the Universe got good reviews (86% positive audience reviews) but only grossed $110 million against a budget of around $180 million. It was released a few weeks after several other big releases, including two unexpected surprise hits. An audience that can't see everything then chooses the film that feels the newest, not necessarily the one with the best critical reception.

The weakness is not limited to the US audience, either. We already told the story of how Hollywood is losing ground to local cinema in China, long its second-biggest market worldwide (read our article): major US franchises are also declining there, replaced by successful Chinese productions. A model designed to dominate a homogeneous global market is thus running out of steam on several fronts at once, not just in front of a US audience tired of sequels.

For French cinema, this Hollywood stumble has an unexpected effect. Over the whole of 2025, French films captured 37.9% of the box office, compared to 34.9% for American films — their lowest level since 1982. In the first five months of 2026, the gap narrowed further (44.4% vs. 45%). The French system, where the CNC* funds part of national cinema through advance on receipts* regardless of expected box office success alone, leaves room for original films that the purely commercial Hollywood system increasingly reserves less of. France also has its own franchises (Asterix, Kaamelott), but they weigh far less in its box office than American franchises do in theirs.

Share of sequels/franchises in the North American box office top 10 50% (vs 90% in 2024)
Sequels with budgets over $150M that miss their theatrical mark At least 3 (in 2026, same as in 2025)

Hollywood peut-il encore compter sur ses franchises ?

What we're assessing
  • FavorableLe cinéma se rééquilibre : les films inédits confirment leur place aux côtés de franchises mieux calibrées, sans crise financière.
  • StableLes studios maintiennent leur rythme de suites malgré les échecs, compensés par quelques gros succès, sans changer de stratégie.
  • DégradéLes suites coûteuses continuent d'échouer en série, forçant des annulations et une vraie contraction de la production.
Favorable
27%
Likely

Original films gain lasting ground

The rebalancing that began in 2026 continues: studios invest more in original films with controlled budgets, following the winning bet of Warner Bros. with Sinners and One Battle After Another, awarded at the Oscars the same year three big-budget sequels flopped. The big franchises that still come out are better calibrated — tighter budgets, fewer competing releases in the same month — and find their audience without multiplying costly failures like those of 2025 and 2026.

This is the least likely of the three scenarios, because it assumes that Disney and Universal, which have so far shown no sign of changing strategy, also start reducing their sequel production — not just Warner Bros. Less likely than the stable scenario, which requires no change of course. Also less likely than the degraded one, because the pace of ultra-budget releases scheduled through 2029 (Frozen 3, Avengers: Secret Wars) shows, at this stage, no sign of slowing down.


Indicators affected
  • Part des suites/franchises dans le top 10 US 35-45 % (le rééquilibrage se poursuit) ↓ (vs 50 % en 2026)
  • Suites à 150 M$+ qui ratent leur budget 1-2 en 2027 (net recul) ↓ (vs au moins 3 en 2026)
The France angleSince 2025, French films have captured a theatrical market share unseen in over forty years (37.9% vs 34.9% for US films over the full year); a Hollywood that reinvents itself without collapsing reinforces this dynamic without lowering overall attendance, on which the theaters screening French films also depend. ↑ Rather favorable for France.
Stable
48%
Likely

Studios keep betting on sequels despite failures

Disney keeps its eleven sequels and remakes locked in through 2029, Universal focuses its annual exhibitor presentation on franchises and horror, and the failures of 2026 are absorbed as a fluke rather than a wake-up call. The big expected hits — Avengers: Doomsday in December 2026, a whole year carried by Spider-Man: Brand New Day — are enough to maintain the sector's average profitability, even if some individual films disappoint.

This is the most likely of the three scenarios, because it exactly extends the current situation: two out of three studios have announced no change in strategy, despite repeated failures. More likely than the favorable one, which would require a structural shift that nothing currently indicates at Disney or Universal. Also more likely than the degraded one, because total box office is still growing in 2026 ($9.8 billion expected, vs $8.6 in 2025), which limits the immediate financial pressure on studios.


Indicators affected
  • Part des suites/franchises dans le top 10 US 45-55 % (niveau de 2026 maintenu) → (vs 50 % en 2026)
  • Suites à 150 M$+ qui ratent leur budget environ 3 en 2027 (rythme inchangé) → (vs au moins 3 en 2026)
The France angleThe French film financing system (CNC's advance on receipts, independent of expected box office success alone) partly shields French films from a logic of mandatory sequels; their market share therefore remains historically strong (44.4% in the first five months of 2026, vs 45% for US films). ↑ Rather favorable for France.
Degraded
25%
Unlikely

Big-budget sequel failures multiply, studios cut back

After Star Wars: The Mandalorian and Grogu, Masters of the Universe, and Supergirl in 2026, new sequels with budgets over $150 million fail to break even in 2027. Even Avatar, the most profitable franchise in history, has already lost a third of its audience between its second and third installments. The studios, caught off guard, cancel or postpone already-announced projects and reduce their investments in original films rather than franchises — the opposite of Warner Bros.' bet.

This scenario remains less likely than the stable one, because no studio has so far announced budget cuts or project cancellations in response to the 2026 failures. But it is more likely than the favorable one, because the number of ultra-budget sequels missing their mark has remained high for two consecutive years (three in 2025, three in 2026), without any studio other than Warner Bros. changing its strategy to reverse it.


Indicators affected
  • Part des suites/franchises dans le top 10 US 70-80 % (retour en force malgré les échecs) ↑ (vs 50 % en 2026)
  • Suites à 150 M$+ qui ratent leur budget 5 ou plus en 2027 (accélération) ↑ (vs au moins 3 en 2026)
The France angleA contraction in the number of big US releases would reduce overall French theater attendance, on which French films also depend to fill cinemas between two domestic releases — a drop in total admissions would weigh on the entire exhibition sector, including French films. ↓ Rather unfavorable for France.

Ordres de grandeur indicatifs pour les 3 scénarios ci-dessus, estimés avec l'information disponible à la publication et réévalués si la situation change — jamais des prévisions garanties. Learn more about our method →

Key takeaways

Après plusieurs suites à gros budget qui ont flanché en salle en 2026, le modèle des franchises qui fait tourner Hollywood depuis vingt ans reste-t-il aussi rentable qu'avant ?

En 2026, la part des suites et remakes dans le top 10 du box-office nord-américain est tombée à 50 %, contre 90 % en 2024, pendant qu'au moins trois franchises à plus de 150 millions de dollars de budget (Star Wars, Masters of the Universe, Supergirl) ratent leur pari en salle.

Le plus probable (48 %) : les studios maintiennent leur rythme de suites malgré les échecs, portés par les gros succès attendus comme Avengers : Doomsday, sans changer de stratégie ni traverser de vraie crise financière.

Signal à surveiller : le résultat au box-office d'Avengers : Doomsday à sa sortie le 18 décembre 2026, et l'annonce ou non de nouvelles coupes budgétaires chez Disney ou Universal lors de la publication de leurs résultats trimestriels début 2027.

Assez positif

Notre évaluation de l'impact pour la France : assez positif. Les scénarios favorable (27 %) et stable (48 %), soit 75 % de probabilité cumulée, profitent tous deux à la part de marché historiquement forte des films français en salle ; seul le dégradé (25 %), en réduisant le nombre total de sorties américaines et donc la fréquentation globale, pèserait sur l'ensemble de l'exploitation française.

Quick glossary

Franchise (cinematic)
A series of films sharing the same characters or universe, designed to produce multiple sequels, spin-offs, or remakes over several years.
Spin-off
A film derived from an existing franchise, centered on a secondary character or a part of the original universe rather than its main storyline.
Reboot
A fresh start for a franchise, going back to square one (new actors, new continuity) rather than extending the story of previous films.
Return on investment (ROI)
The ratio between the money a film earns and its production cost — an ROI of 3 means the film grossed three times its outlay.
CinemaCon
The annual gathering of US cinema exhibitors, where studios present their upcoming films to convince theaters to book screen space.
CNC
The National Center for Cinema, the French public body that funds part of national cinema independently of expected box office success alone.
Advance on receipts
A financial grant from the CNC awarded to a film before its release, to be repaid only if it finds its audience — a safety net that allows funding of films without guarantee of commercial success.
See all terms explained so far → Glossary

Sources

See also today's press roundup →

Vote before you see the outcome — find us everywhere

Every day, a poll on our Telegram channel: vote for the scenario you think is most likely before you even see the real probabilities above.

Find us also across all our channels: